The .map file is probably OK, but the critical thing is that the feta*.pfa files really belong to your current LilyPond version.
What does grep CreationDate `kpsewhich feta20.pfa` return?
The flag -u -lilypond.map tells dvips to use the scalable fonts *.pfa instead of bitmap fonts *.*pk in the Postscript. You won't see much of a difference in the .ps file unless you magnify it but it makes a huge difference in how PDF files appear on screen.
By the way, could you clarify more exactly what you mean by "look dreadful".
/Mats
Robert de Vries wrote:
I have the same problem. The results of the builtin ps conversion look dreadful.
On Tuesday 07 October 2003 11:23, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
Make sure that the files lilypond.map and feta20.pfa are installed and belong to the 2.0.0 installation. Also, make sure that the teTeX filename database is up to date by running 'texhash' as root.
done that
To find out where dvips finds the files, run the following commands: kpsewhich --format='dvips config' lilypond.map kpsewhich feta20.pfa
Looks ok to me too.
Both should return the full path to the corresponding file.
And they do.
Invoking `dvips -ta4 -Ppdf -G0 -u +lilypond.map -oteste.ps teste.dvi
But if I run the command without the -u +lilypond.map it works. So something is fishy with the lilypond.map file I guess.
I run 2.0.1 redhat version as made available from the download page.
Robert
_______________________________________________ Lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
-- ============================================= Mats Bengtsson Signal Processing Signals, Sensors and Systems Royal Institute of Technology SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM Sweden Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463 Fax: (+46) 8 790 7260 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe =============================================
_______________________________________________ Lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
