On Friday 24 October 2003 03:51 pm, Rune Zedeler wrote: > David Raleigh Arnold wrote: > > I guess I didn't understand your proposal then, or you changed it > > and I missed it. Sorry. I'm happy to withdraw my characterization > > of it having the disadvantages of both, etc.. To quote: > > > > "So »c d e d c« and »c d' e' d, c,« would mean the same thing." > > I don't understand what you mean. > It is true that in "relativetwo" c d e d c and c d' e' d, c, mean the > same thing (namely the same as c d e d c in the old relative mode).
I didn't get it. Sorry. I'm doing something else. To reduce the typing for absolute pitch, these alternatives could be allowed: c'4 or c1'4 c''4 or c2'4 c'''4 or c3'4 c,4 or c1,4 c,,4 or c2,4 c,,,4 or c3,4 c,,,,4 or c4,4 Of course it would seem kind of stupid to use it for most voices, but for a part with a wide range and a lot of large intervals it would actually be more readable as well as quicker to type. daveA _______________________________________________ Lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user