Do you have access to the "Das trunkne Lied" score? I'd be interested in a comparison with this. Depending on the score configuration and maybe other programs' load this takes 5-8 minutes to compile on my machine.
Urs Am 16. April 2015 16:43:03 MESZ, schrieb Phil Holmes <m...@philholmes.net>: >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Trevor Daniels" <t.dani...@treda.co.uk> >To: "Phil Holmes" <philehol...@googlemail.com>; "LilyPond User Group" ><lilypond-user@gnu.org> >Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2015 3:28 PM >Subject: Re: Windows performance > > >> >> Phil Holmes wrote Thursday, April 16, 2015 2:00 PM >> >> >>> The performance of LilyPond 2.19.18 on Windows is _much_ better than >>> previous versions. Some examples: >>> >>> A 26 page multi-score piece I've been working on: >>> 2.19.16: 114s to compile >>> 2.19.18: 52s >> ... [etc] >> >> That's remarkable. I can see no change between 2.19.16 >> and 2.19.18 that might account for this enormous change. >> The only effect of this magnitude which I've seen in the >> past is to do with setting up the font library when LP >> is run for the first time. But that would be an increase. >> >> Any chance your 2.19.18 is using a different hard disk, >> an SSD maybe, which the others weren't? >> >> Trevor > > >No. They're all installed on an SSD. It's CPU limited anyway. > >I thought 2.19.16 might be quicker because of the change to the >compiler, >but, as you say, have no idea why .18 is so much quicker than .16. I'm > >pretty certain it's a genuine difference: I only noticed because the >score I >was working on suddenly appeared more quickly! > >-- >Phil Holmes > > >_______________________________________________ >lilypond-user mailing list >lilypond-user@gnu.org >https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
