2015-04-22 19:24 GMT+02:00 Stephen MacNeil <classicalja...@gmail.com>: > Harm , Thomas Morley and others > I like to follow the discussions even if I don't understand/need something > because I usually learn a lot and sometimes even adapt some ideas or code > into something I can use later. > > In this thread I was amazed that the scheme created could interpret the > chords!!!
Well, it does not! Apart from the most simple cases and only in c-major. ;) It may be doable to extend the ChordRootNamer to cover more keys and let our chord-naming-engine do some additional work. But it will likely be restricted to the simpelst use cases (as others mentioned already) > I tend to analyze music (almost daily). Usually I print it out and > go over it and mark in what I need. When I saw this i instantly tried it on > some of my scores and was amazed. > > Now where I was lost was - > 1. is it possible to make it read polyphony? <<\top \\ \bottom>> without re > writing it as a chord? > 2. the ability to add it to any score as needed for analysis > 3. to only transpose when needed to specific keys? > 4. use not only pianoStaff but whatever the score uses A summarizing answer: For most questioned I'd answer: I don't know or I doubt At least I don't have the time to work on it. There's a patch of mine needing some rework and I didn't add a single line of code to it for about 2 weeks ... > > Thanks > > Stephen > > And I really was impressed > and liked how it listed the chord and numeral Cheers, Harm _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user