> I just spotted \time 3/4 or 4/4, jianpu display " 6 - ." , I think it should 
> be "6 - -". 

Plus, I made a mistake in the original version about rests. Rests beyond one 
beat are displayed as repeated "0"s e.g. "0 0 0 0" for whole rest.
In addition, I have noticed that in 2015-04-23_222211.png provided by Ming, 
slurs are sometimes drawn below note heads, it should be always in above.


Thanks!


David Zhang




------------------ 原始邮件 ------------------
发件人: "MING TSANG"<tsan...@rogers.com>; 
发送时间: 2015年4月24日(星期五) 上午10:34
收件人: "Paul Morris"<p...@paulwmorris.com>; 
抄送: "lilypond-user"<lilypond-user@gnu.org>; "Super-User"<david...@qq.com>; 
主题: Re: Jianpu Notation



Paul,


Thank you for the update to jianpu5.ly.
 I just spotted \time 3/4 or 4/4, jianpu display " 6 - ." , I think it should 
be "6 - -".   Please refer to .png
Technically it is ok- the . represent 1/2 of "6 -" which is three beats.
"6 - -" also depict three beats -- I saw all jianpu use this notation.
When you have time please update this. Thank you for your time and patience.  


Immanuel,
Ming Tsang.
  



     On Thursday, April 23, 2015 4:11 PM, Paul Morris <p...@paulwmorris.com> 
wrote:
  
  

 Hi Ming,

> On Apr 23, 2015, at 7:41 AM, MING TSANG <tsan...@rogers.com> wrote:
> 
> Good morning Paul,
> 
> Thank you very much for you jianpu4.ly.
> 
> I run your jianpu-test.ly and sportted one note not the same in key C and key 
> D.  The 2nd note on third measure - a dot below the horizontal bar is missing 
> in key D.

Good catch.  I see now that the octave dots in Jianpu are not based on the 
absolute octave of the note but are relative to the current key / key 
signature.  In other words, the Jianpu octave increases between 7 and 1, and 
not between b and c.  

Attached is a new version jianpu5.ly that gets the octave dots right.  Let me 
know if you see anything else that’s not correct.

I have also changed the name of the custom staff context to JianpuStaff to 
match the other staff contexts in LilyPond.  (Although I have a slight 
preference for having it the other way around, consistency is good.)

Thanks for your appreciation!

-Paul
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Reply via email to