> On May 17, 2015, at 7:48 PM, Carl Sorensen <c_soren...@byu.edu> wrote: > > This is a nice implementation -- I didn't think it could be done!
Thanks Carl! > I think > it should be made part of LilyPond, if the performance hit is not too big. > It seems to create a lot of stencils, but maybe that is no problem. I wondered whether or not it should be part of LilyPond (with this implementation) but I’ll be glad to submit it. If there is a performance hit, it will at least be limited because it will likely not be used on that many stencils in any given score. > I'd like to see a couple of changes. > > 2pi-over-density should be changed to something like angle-increment. > 2pi-over-density is the function used to calculate it; the meaning is > really angle-increment. > > And I think that in-fill-density should be changed radius-increment. Those make sense to me. > Then you could say that the function works by creating series of white > stencils radially offset from the black stencil with angles from 0 to 2 > pi, at an increment of angle-increment, and with radii from > radius-increment to offset. > > At that point, we can understand how the function creates an outline. That’s a nice description, thanks! > Oh, and there should be some documentation that indicates that offset is > in staff-spaces. Yep. > Thanks again for creating this! Glad you like it! -Paul _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
