I suppose that you used the property Staff.minimumVerticalExtent,
which affects the spacing around each stave, no matter if it's one
stave out of several in a full orchestral score or if it's the only
stave.

The distance between score lines is affected by a paper variable called
interscoreline, as described in Section 4.6.5 Page layout of the manual.
You may want to reduce that instead.

   /Mats

Graham Percival wrote:
On 12-Aug-04, at 11:58 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I experience some little glitches by trying to reduce the overall
vertical spacing on a very simple song containing a line of lyrics and
only one staff. When I reduce verticalExtent, it looks like the first
two lines of Staff are closer than the other lines... I have seen no
way to reduce the vertical Extent for all the lines without the two
first ones being closer than the succeeding ones.


The other staff lines might be forced to be farther apart due to
articulations, text, dynamics, etc.  Certainly the verticalExtent
property is supposed to affect all lines.  What happens if you set
verticalExtent to a really small number (ie 0), or a really big
number (say, 10) ?  Does the problem remain?

If the problem remains, could you send us a small example that demonstrates this?

P.S : please CC me the answer since I am not on the list !


Don't worry; policy on this list is to CC everybody, even when we know
that they're on the list.  :)

Cheers,
- Graham



_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

-- ============================================= Mats Bengtsson Signal Processing Signals, Sensors and Systems Royal Institute of Technology SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM Sweden Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463 Fax: (+46) 8 790 7260 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe =============================================


_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Reply via email to