2015-08-19 0:34 GMT+02:00 David Nalesnik <david.nales...@gmail.com>: > Hi, > > On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Heikki Junes <heikki.ju...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> Thanks David! >> >> Yes, it provides the exactly the desired result! > > > Glad I could help! See the attached for a completed adaptation. > > I wonder if this function would better be defined in Scheme than C++. If > someone wanted to do something like you're doing, it wouldn't be a trivial > matter to first redo the function in Scheme to make the necessary changes.
I'd love to see the KeySig-stencil in scheme in our code-base. Or at least a method to get acces to those accidentals, something like ly:note-column-accidentals but for KeySignature. If I think of all those (very) ugly workarounds to affect a single accidental ... Best, Harm _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
