Indeed. I did manage to miss the Score.quotedCueEventTypes part of the docs before, my error.
I'd prefer not to have to list the events in this way, I just want everything included, and listing them sets up the potential for error, in omitting some. As I indicated earlier, I don't know whether 'cue' or 'quote' is the right option from a programmatic point of view. 'Cue' is certainly the colloquial term among musicians for such a part, though! On 19:41, Mon 24 Aug 2015, Wols Lists wrote: > Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 19:41:04 +0100 > From: Wols Lists <antli...@youngman.org.uk> > Subject: Re: Change size of notes in addQuote passage > To: lilypond-user@gnu.org > List-Id: LilyPond user discussion <lilypond-user.gnu.org> > > On 24/08/15 19:32, Simon Albrecht wrote: > > Am 24.08.2015 um 18:59 schrieb owainsut...@gmail.com: > >> Is there a way to (a) use 'transposedCueDuring' which retains these > >> details > >> from the original, > > > Yes, see > > <http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/writing-parts#index-quotedCueEventTypes>. > > > > Although actually a ‘cue’, as you are probably aware, is intended for > > notes which the instrument is not supposed to actually play. > > > Although actually a 'cue', as you are probably aware, is often played by > the wrong instrument in amateur bands because the instrument it's > written for is not there ... :-) :-) :-) > > Cheers, > Wol > > _______________________________________________ > lilypond-user mailing list > lilypond-user@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user > _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
