Am 25.08.2015 um 11:12 schrieb Andrew Bernard:
I am not sure I understand. Is having a symlink:flatten-ly -> /home/username/bin/lilypond-wrapper.guile not correct? The convert-ly utility is set up as: convert-ly -> /home/username/bin/lilypond-wrapper.python
I think that David meant that your script should be callable by lilypond itself, something like lilypond flatten-ly.ly This ensures that all include paths are resolved automatically. A shell script does not know about lilypond's way to find include files ;-) Marc
Andrew On 25/08/2015 18:11, "David Kastrup" <d...@gnu.org <mailto:d...@gnu.org>> wrote: It's not just that. It's also that the lilypond executable is pretty sure to know the search paths of LilyPond. You cannot really get them reliably without calling LilyPond, and if you do that anyway, why not use its interpreter? _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
