Am 20.09.2015 um 11:10 schrieb David Kastrup: [...]
Interpreting c:sus as root and 5 feels strange IMHO.The rule I am using in my current patch (just writing up the documentation) is that c:sus will add a 4 if no step 2 or step 4 is added afterwards (step 2 can be 2+ or 2- as well as just 2).
Sounds reasonable, thanks for your work! Marc _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
