Am 8. Oktober 2015 19:59:57 MESZ, schrieb Sven <lilypond-u...@hotmail.com>: >Sorry, I didn't know this is a known issue. > >And thanks for correcting me on how to actually remove the second >sharp, >Urs: \once \omit Accidental get's rid of the bugger, while \once \hide >Accidental makes it transparent, leaving its space in tact.
Well, it's "correct", but still it is a hack. Maybe you inferred it from he discussion: you get rid of the redindant accidental - but if your line breaking should ever cjange it won't automatically come back. Urs > >Sven > >2015-10-08 19:14 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org>: > >> Simon Albrecht <simon.albre...@mail.de> writes: >> >> > On 08.10.2015 16:38, Trevor Daniels wrote: >> >> Furthermore, if the tie is removed the sharp on the final fis >> >> is also removed. The issue is, without the \break the final fis >> >> needs the sharp as the second fis doesn't have one, being tied >> >> to the first fis. Adding the \break causes the second fis to >> >> need (and get) a sharp, but the sharp on the third fis, which is >> >> now redundant, is not removed. Seems to be a bug to me. >> > >> > And, just as David said, one that is long known and being tracked: >> > <http://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/649/>. There has >been >> > some discussion, but at any rate it’s nonsense to have both >> > accidentals, and IMO the second should be left out. >> >> I don't think there's much of a disagreement on that. It's just that >> it's quite tricky to do. The "remove tied accidental unless after >line >> break" is somewhat easy to do: the accidental in its final phase of >> typesetting checks whether there is a tie leading to it and whether >that >> tie is just a broken-off part of a tie. If it is, the accidental is >> killed. >> >> However, keeping track of the complex relation between this kind of >> line-break related killed accidental and the following one is rather >> harder to pin down since the following one needs to have no vicinity >to >> either tie or line break. >> >> -- >> David Kastrup >> >> > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >_______________________________________________ >lilypond-user mailing list >lilypond-user@gnu.org >https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user -- Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user