Quoting Andrew Bernard (andrew.bern...@gmail.com): > No, it was truncated, but in a hard to understand way - quite irregular. But > we > now know that was an artefact of the narrowing issue, and has not occurred > again. Widening did not help.
Terms are important here. There's a world of difference between the appearance (ie presentation) of the buffer being truncated (and even unrestorable) and the actual contents of the buffer being truncated. The former is an annoyance, the latter far more serious. Cheers, David. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
