Thomas Morley <thomasmorle...@gmail.com> writes: > 2015-10-24 23:20 GMT+02:00 Thomas Morley <thomasmorle...@gmail.com>: >> >> Well, it's not related to my changes, as far as I can tell. See: >> >> \markup { >> \fret-diagram-verbose #'( >> (place-fret 4 0) >> ) >> } >> >> I could follow this one bac to 2.14.2, the oldest I've installed atm >> >> Though, the syntax to enter an open string is `(open 4)', but with >> this you can't print text inside the dot. It is currently not >> supported. >> Nevertheless, I'd call the additional barre a bug. >> >> Please file a bug report, if none exists already (didn't check). I may >> have a look tomorrow (hopefully). >> >> Cheers, >> Harm > > Ok, I looked into it already. > > It's this line in fret-diagrams.scm: > (set! capo-fret (1+ (- capo-fret minfret))) > Basically, if minfret and capo-fret are both zero, capo-fret is set 1.
This inspired me to set capo to -1 and indeed the capo indication vanishes: \version "2.19.30" \markup \override #'(size . 5) \override #'(fret-diagram-details . ((finger-code . in-dot))) \fill-line { \fret-diagram-verbose #`( (capo -1) (place-fret 3 0 "g") ) } (I know it's a dirty trick and I'll write a bug report as soon as I can.) > > This is present in 2.14.2 as well, I'll have to think about the reason > for it (and the consequences changing it) Thanks for looking into it! Patrick _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user