At 15:19 25/10/2015 -0500, David Wright wrote:
I'm glad we singers don't meet this sort of thing in "normal" music.
My own take is for having extra accidentals (ie clef
changes=>forget) but also the extra cancellations (1471). (Perhaps
written above.)
[from a position of ignorance of convention.]
For what it's worth, Elaine Gould has no doubt of the convention -
that such accidentals are required: "An accidental holds good only in
the clef in which it is written. A change of clef requires a further
accidental for a note of the same pitch..." (Behind Bars, p 78).
Brian Barker
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
