Hi Kieren, Am 19.11.2015 um 19:23 schrieb Kieren MacMillan: >> you should rather stick to the right syntax > David *is* using the right syntax: “rit” (etc.) is a tempo marking > (MetronomeMark), not an arbitrary text markup (TextScript).
Thinking about it twice, I realize that you are right. The meaning of rit is closer to a metronome mark. It is just that I am used to a different tradition in piano scores where the 'rit' is printed between the two staves instead of above and bold. That lead me to think (unconsciously) that rit and metronome marks are fundamentally different. And I still think that there is some difference between 'rit' and 'Allegro'. Cheers, Joram _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
