> But LilyPond's chord-naming names actually played chord notes, not
> anticipated chords.

I agree - it's not a good idea to confuse the chord with the underlying scale. 
If you want a minor chord sounding, then use one; you can *add* a 4th (or 
better 11th) to that.

Best, Robert 



> 
> -- 
> David Kastrup
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> lilypond-user@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Reply via email to