Am 12. Dezember 2015 23:08:53 MEZ, schrieb Paul Morris <p...@paulwmorris.com>: >> On Dec 12, 2015, at 3:34 PM, Johan Vromans <jvrom...@squirrel.nl> >wrote: >> >> If I understand the procedure correctly, wouldn't it be easier to use >a >> tool like fontforge add/adjust font glyphs? > >Maybe so, but the result is less portable because (if I understand >correctly) you'd have to have a custom font and have it installed >correctly, etc. for anyone to be able to use the glyph... as opposed >to just having the custom glyphs in an include file that you’re going >to be including anyway. > >-Paul
I think the font idea *may* be an approach worth considering. Our stuff will reside in a library anyway, and I think it should be possible to have that library call a font reliably when it is in the same directory IIRC. We could then have a font with glyphs for each constituent of your accidentals and construct the actual accidental as a markup using \combine, which should be pretty straightforward. Urs >_______________________________________________ >lilypond-user mailing list >lilypond-user@gnu.org >https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user -- Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
