Am 13.01.2016 um 18:09 schrieb Urs Liska:
> Hi all,
>
> one more beaming question,
>
> given the following input
>
> \relative a' {
> \time 6/8
> \set strictBeatBeaming = ##t
> a8.. a32 a16 a
> }
>
> which of the attached engravings do you prefer, LilyPond's current or
> the modified?
> Would it make sense to add a beaming option (e.g.
> "strictBeatBeamingNonFlagSide") so the user can choose?
Note that I think this is actually the difference between subdivideBeams
being ##t or ##f.
Currently LilyPond produces the second rendering from my previous post,
regardless of subdivisions or not.
So I'd say *with* strictBeatBeaming *and* subdivided beams the non-flag
side should have its stems governed by the rhythmic position of the
subdivision while with strictBeatBeaming and *no* subdivisions it should
have the beam number of the following stem.
Objections?
Urs
> Best
> Urs
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> lilypond-user@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
