Hi Blöchl, > 1. Why is Cm69 (ly) = C6/9 (BR)? Where is the "MI" gone? Is it kind of > implied? I don't see it.
If you followed the thread further, you’d see that it was an error: the “MI” is, of course, supposed to be there. That error been fixed in my [private] copy, which I am continuing to develop with the intention of releasing publicly when it’s ready. Regards, Kieren. ________________________________ Kieren MacMillan, composer ‣ website: www.kierenmacmillan.info ‣ email: i...@kierenmacmillan.info _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
