Hi Malte,
Thanks for the reply!
That sounds very good, actually - I'll give it a try tonight.
Best, Robert
> On 25 Jan 2016, at 10:21, Malte Meyn <lilyp...@maltemeyn.de> wrote:
>
>
>
>> Am 25.01.2016 um 10:00 schrieb Robert Schmaus:
>>
>> One more thought: My original approach of simply \include-ing LilyJAZZ
>> should be the standard way of using it. Which makes me think, that there's
>> either something missing in LilyJAZZ to work in v2.19 ... or a bug in
>> Lilypond.
>
> Since version 2.19.12 vanilla LilyPond supports other music fonts like
> LilyJAZZ. So the “standard way of using” has changed in this version;
> you don’t need any include files anymore but something like
>
> \paper {
> #(define fonts
> (set-global-fonts
> #:music "lilyjazz"
> #:brace "lilyjazz"
> #:roman "lilyjazz-text"
> #:sans "lilyjazz-chord"
> #:factor (/ staff-height pt 20)
> ))
> }
>
> The openlilylib stylesheets are just files which switch the font but
> also do some other changes (slur, stem, barline thicknesses, text fonts, …).
>
>> Shouldn't I notify the bug team of this and if so, how do I do that?
>
> I don’t think it’s a bug because Lily has this new way of using music
> fonts and doesn’t need the old hacks anymore ;)
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> lilypond-user@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
