Hi, Simon

Although I still have some corrections to do, proposed by Brian, I would love to first close your suggestions.

Yeah, last times have been rough, so a lot of time since this e-mail.

On 11/12/15 22:55, Simon Albrecht wrote:
On 11.12.2015 22:27, Alberto Simões wrote:

It is in the common place:
https://github.com/ambs/music/tree/master/Gounod/FuneralMarchOfAMarionette

Just from a quick glance:
– The slur in m. 23/24 is definitely not publication quality. You could
try \shape or better, \shapeII (of openlilylib; it has bugs, though).

I am not sure what slur you were talking about, but when adding the page-count to 4, they all changed, and probably look better now?

– the ppp in the last bars look odd so far to the left

I think they are better now. I pushed them a little to the right (the first time, and I continue doing do) because they were overlapping with the measure line.

– And I’d try \paper { page-count = 4 }, it should work fine.

There are a lot of warnings in the lilypond output now, but yes, lilypond manages to put everything in 4 pages. Not sure if it isn't too crowded now. Please give me your opinion.

Thanks,
Alberto

_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Reply via email to