Hi Andrew,
> But when slurs are up and stems are up they can’t start at 4:30 can they?
Of course they can. In the best of all possible worlds, the user would be able
[without explicit and individual \shape or #’details overrides] to say
something like
<pseudocode>
\override Score.Slur.attachment-point = #’((Notehead . center) (Stem . tip))
\override Score.Slur.left.attachment-angle = #’((Notehead . -45) (Stem .
-45))
\override Score.Slur.right.attachment-angle = #’((Notehead . -135) (Stem .
-135))
\override Score.Slur.left.attachment-padding = #’((Notehead . 0.66) (Stem .
0.9))
\override Score.Slur.right.attachment-padding = #’((Notehead . 0.5) (Stem .
1.1))
% etc.
<\pseudocode>
That is to say, it wouldn’t be difficult to find a few (e.g., 6?)
settings/parameters by which exactly the global override I’m thinking of would
be achievable.
In particular, regarding the [fake] #’attachment-point parameter above: Janek’s
\shape function(s) has/have [because of my request, actually] an override that
allows you to determine the attachment point. So clearly much of this work is
already done, if not “Pond-worthy”.
Thoughts?
Thanks,
Kieren.
________________________________
Kieren MacMillan, composer
‣ website: www.kierenmacmillan.info
‣ email: i...@kierenmacmillan.info
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
