Thanks for the help everyone. Craig
On 19 February 2016 at 09:35, Thomas Morley <thomasmorle...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2016-02-18 23:31 GMT+01:00 tisimst <tisimst.lilyp...@gmail.com>: > > > > On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 3:26 PM, Kieren MacMillan [via Lilypond] <[hidden > > email]> wrote: > >> > >> Hi Harm, > >> > >> > A hacky solution for one-time use > >> > >> This is great! The only thing I could suggest is that the font for the > bar > >> numbers shouldn’t be the same as the big MMR number font. > > > > > > Yes, very nice! I've been trying to do this for a little while now, but > this > > lays some excellent ground-work. > > > >> > >> > A cleaner one would likely need an engraver. > >> > >> I see this kind of numbering a fair bit in musical theatre scores. I > don’t > >> know if it’s common elsewhere, but it might be a nice feature in the > >> Lilypond toolkit. > > > > > > Thomas, is there a permanent form for \applyOutput? That way you don't > need > > to do this every time you want to use it? > > > > Best, > > Abraham > > > > I'm a little surprised about the positive echo about my little coding. > For me it was more a coding-exercise to get myself more familiar with > \applyOutput. (David K recently demonstrated it's usage.) > I've never seen this kind of annotations myself. > As said before, a cleaner and switched-on/off-on-demand-coding > requires an engraver, as far as I can see now. > > Although a more permanent form may likely be achieved by mapping the > function over some music, I think an engraver would be preferable. > > I'll try to give it a go the upcoming days. > > Cheers, > Harm > > _______________________________________________ > lilypond-user mailing list > lilypond-user@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user >
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
