"Peter Gentry" <peter.gen...@sunscales.co.uk> writes:
> How did potential malware links get into the list, it hasn't happend
> before? If its not spam then the poster should be less cryptic
> or he won't get anyone interested.
Spam sent with a spoofed address from a list participant.
The headers indicate
Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim
4.71)
(envelope-from <m...@mouries.net>) id 1abl63-0001w5-GC
for lilypond-user@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Mar 2016 03:28:30 -0500
Original-Received: from mbob.nabble.com ([162.253.133.15]:52587)
by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
(envelope-from <m...@mouries.net>) id 1abl63-0001uG-8E
for lilypond-user@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Mar 2016 03:28:27 -0500
Original-Received: from msam.nabble.com (unknown [162.253.133.85])
by mbob.nabble.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4078222658C
for <lilypond-user@gnu.org>; Fri, 4 Mar 2016 00:20:03 -0800 (PST)
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: iOS iPhone or iPad
X-Received-From: 162.253.133.15
Which seems like an injection via Nabble.com. Rather than a spoofed
mail address, this would rather look like a hacked account at
Nabble.com. Much less likely, a hacked iPad (but what kind of
virus/worm would try going through a Nabble account next?).
Marc? Any ideas?
--
David Kastrup
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
