> On Mar 9, 2016, at 6:27 PM, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote:
>
> \version "2.19.28"
>
> show =
> #(define-music-function (mup item) (markup? symbol-list-or-music?)
> (propertyTweak 'stencil
> (lambda (grob)
> (grob-interpret-markup grob mup))
> item))
>
> \relative c' \new Staff {
> \show \markup \compound-meter #'(4 . 3)
> \time 3/4
> c4 c c | c c c
> }
>
> Maybe we should have \show (possibly with a different name) as a nice
> supplement to \omit/\hide.
This seems like a good idea to me. Previously when this was discussed, I
argued that the function should take a stencil as well as a markup and maybe a
procedure too… but I now see the sense in just providing a simple and
high-level shortcut that takes a markup. (And “ \markup \stencil sss “ still
allows use of stencils.)
Cheers,
-Paul
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
