Op Sun, 24 Apr 2016 10:41:53 +0200 David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> schreef:
> And I haven't seen _any_ compelling argument yet _why_ there is no > useful common ground between Python2 and Python3 that could do the job > without major rewrites of the current code base. I have maintained the Frescobaldi (written python) codebase for a long time supporting both python 2.7 and 3.x. It is not dificult to support both but it is really needed that you require 2.7 at least when using python 2. The python-ly library which I'm also the author/maintainer of will support both Python 2.7 and 3 for the foreseeable future. I think that gradually making the python codebase in LilyPond work with 2.7 and 3.2+ is doable and that will give enough flexibility for packagers and distributors. -- Wilbert Berendsen, musician ‣ mail: i...@wilbertberendsen.nl ‣ web: www.wilbertberendsen.nl ‣ phone: +31646122877 _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user