----- Original Message -----
From: "Johan Vromans" <jvrom...@squirrel.nl>
To: <lilypond-user@gnu.org>
Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2016 10:50 PM
Subject: Re: Using strings and other types to return markup
On Wed, 11 May 2016 17:58:52 +0100
"Phil Holmes" <m...@philholmes.net> wrote:
Attached is my LilyPond approximation of that
section of the madrigal.
Regarding the ye versus Þe -- it seems wrong to me to simulate the
appearance of a handwritten glyph (thorn, but looking like y) with the
wrong
glyph.
This is a generic problem when typesetting hand-written texts. For
example,
some people like to write a z with a tail ('long zett' IIRC). When
transcribing, should this be simulated with e.g. an ezh? Or just use a z
since that is the meaning of the glyph?
The original I'm using is not hand-written - it's printed - and the
character used in it is an actual y.
--
Phil Holmes
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
