Thank you to Robert Schmaus, Andrew Bernard, David Wright for the suggestions.
I try to be more precise. It's not that really I need to be able to enroll some lilypond code. (1) I was curios to know if LP or Frescobaldi give this functionality (2) I thought that maybe this functionality was available because LP compiler probably create a intermediate enrolled structure (substituting variable with their contents, substituing function like "\traspose" with the trasnposed music etc.). (3) I have written some lilypond music in a terrible way and I would be curios to see it in a more linear way :) I also thought that having the music enrolled would be the preliminary step for the opposite process. Having an alghorithm that looks for repetition and try to rewrite the music in a more more compacted way (using repetition, transpose etc. etc.) As you can understand this is very much a curiosity than a need. But I'm expecially curious about (2). The Robert idea: LP -> Midi -> LP is correct but I have some experience going from Midi to LP and I always hope to be able to avoid it :) As Andrew and David point out you need a lot of work after the conversion. In my opinion this is to be considered possible only just in theory or for simple/short music. g. -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/unroll-code-tp190602p190618.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
