On Thu 14 Jul 2016 at 19:07:41 (+0200), Jonathan Scholbach wrote: > Sorry, guys, for being so rude. But can we talk about LP-features instead of > arguing about best-practice-typesetting? That would be nice :) > To me, this discussion is somewhat obsolete. A good program should leave the > decision to the user. And that's where LP is failing at the moment, cause > user cannot choose the option very many - not to say: the very most - > engravers of choir scores opted for.
I apologise for fighting your corner. > \accidentalStyle piano works in GrandStaff, but is needed in ChoirStaff. So > can somebody please be so kind to invest her energy, time and skills into > this problem instead of wasting her capacities in a discussion about a > question which is at least in part a matter of personal taste? I tried to > manipulate the scm/music-functions.scm but, since I do not understand it, > without success. I don't know whether my contribution could persuade Phil that reputable publishers print what he, as a singer, might find confusing. However, as a LP Main Developer and a member of the Bug Squad, he might be the sort of person to be able to make such a that change if he was won over. > Thank you ever so much for your help, If you mean for the workaround, HTH, thanks. Cheers, David. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user