On Mon 18 Jul 2016 at 08:23:21 (-0700), tisimst wrote: > BGM & David, > On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 8:35 AM, David Wright [via Lilypond] < > ml-node+s1069038n192791...@n5.nabble.com> wrote: > > On Mon 18 Jul 2016 at 08:41:13 (-0500), Br. Gabriel-Marie | SSPX wrote: > > > I have a song that goes like this: > > > ---------------------------------- > > > soprano > > > alto > > > 15 lyric verses in between > > > tenor > > > bass > > > > > > soprano > > > alto > > > just one lyric in between - it's the chorus > > > tenor > > > bass > > > > > > > > > soprano > > > alto > > > 15 lyric verses in between \repeatOfFourWords > > > tenor > > > bass > > > > If the material is sufficiently heterogeneous, it can > > make sense to concatenate multiple scores. > > > > True, but I'm pretty sure multiple \score blocks aren't needed here, but > rather make the notes/lyrics sequential.
You're quite right. But the way my mailboxes are arranged, I was prejudiced by possible aversion to skips http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2016-06/msg00343.html and need for extra annotations http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2016-06/msg00380.html and thought we'd already come up with a solution like yours: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2016-06/msg00350.html ...or, rather, its predecessors. I get very confused about whether to take account of previous context or treat every thread as a fresh start. I thought the main problem was the accidental inclusion of the << >>. I found the correct usage of << >> and the way it interacts with \\ to be one of the harder things to get my head around when I was first learning LP. But that's an aside. Cheers, David. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
