Hi Harm, Thanks for the explanation(s).
> The hash isn't a scheme-thingy here in a .ly-file! It just tells the > _LilyPond_-parser "scheme follows”. > But if you use it this way in a .scm-file it throws an error. That was my original understanding; thanks for the confirmation. > it usually makes no sense to use `define-public' _in_ a .ly-file, > it doesn't hurt either, though. Okay… hmmm… then I’m definitely confused. (I thought that might be the problem.) > Regarding your desired usage I still think there's no scheme-problem, > but something else. How can I make a 'minimal example' which includes at least two files (one in scm/, with a huge amount of other, likely irrelevant, code in it)? Thanks, Kieren. ________________________________ Kieren MacMillan, composer ‣ website: www.kierenmacmillan.info ‣ email: i...@kierenmacmillan.info _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
