Actually I like No. 10 best for its simplicity, elegance and recognition value. But as I said before: I don't think this quite unordered process fit for creating and selecting a logo. In the end, those who cry out loudest might have their will, while there has been no agreement even on how the selection should be done. Or do I have too little faith in crowd intelligence and the aesthetic reckoning of everybody who likes working with Lilypond? Best, Simon
Am 07-Aug-2016 17:11:44 +0200 schrieb carsonm...@ca.rr.com: Pierre: Nix 4, 5, 10, and 11. Thank you Mark FROM: lilypond-user [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr....@gnu.org] ON BEHALF OF Pierre Perol-Schneider SENT: Sunday, August 07, 2016 5:14 AM TO: Noeck CC: lilypond-user SUBJECT: Re: LilyPond logo? pdf 2016-08-07 14:13 GMT+02:00 Pierre Perol-Schneider : Updates. Please select the ones that should be deleted. Cheers Pierre 2016-08-07 9:34 GMT+02:00 Noeck : Hi, > I was never clear on how the LilyPond name was chosen. Note heads for > the pads, and note stems for flowers, maybe. It's a little bit different (in short: women): http://lilypond.org/~janneke/vc/newweb/out/site/about/name Cheers, Joram _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
