Thanks for your reply,
I have no problem with missfonts (anyway kpsewhich ecrm10.pfa returns /usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/ec-fonts-mftraced/ecrm10.pfa)
Xdvi runs fine with dvi generated by lily ; but gv displays strange symbols for graces notes and fermata on bar.
Anyway, I dug a little more and I can get good postscript and pdf files starting with the dvi produced by lily using :
dvips -f -Z flute.dvi > flute.ps
This is dvips(k) 5.92b Copyright 2002 Radical Eye Software (www.radicaleye.com) ' TeX output 2004.10.30:1258' -> dvips: Checksum mismatch in font feta20 dvips: Design size mismatch in font feta26 dvips: Checksum mismatch in font feta26 dvips: Design size mismatch in font feta13 dvips: Checksum mismatch in font feta13 dvips: Design size mismatch in font feta14 dvips: Checksum mismatch in font feta14 <texc.pro><music-drawing-routines.ps><special.pro>. [1] [2] [3] [4]
As you can see, there are still problems (even after having deleted the font caches), but the output is correctly displayed by gv (?)
I'm still using Pedro's packages of lilypond-2.3.24...
Hoping this will help to track the problem,
Thanks,
Alex. Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thanks for your reply. I've just had a closer look at a few things, and I found a log file named missfont.log in my project directory, which contains the line
mktexpk --mfmode ljfour --bdpi 8000 --mag 1+0/8000 --dpi 8000 ecrm1000
Does this give any clues as to the problem?
yes - I suspect that the font package is installed incorrectly. over here I have
byrd:~/usr/src/lilypond$ kpsewhich ecrm10.pfa /usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/ec-fonts-mftraced/ecrm10.pfa
what does kpsewhich say?
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
