Simon Albrecht <simon.albre...@mail.de> writes: > On 06.09.2016 16:50, Simon Albrecht wrote: >> On 06.09.2016 12:51, Andrew Bernard wrote: >>> Hi Federico, >>> >>> But that tool does not change German variable names into names that >>> are in English, and more meaningful to a speaker of that >>> language. [There is lots of scheme in that circle of fifths code >>> with names that in German to me mean nothing.] >>> >>> So I still think it would be beneficial to have a fully Anglicised >>> version of the code on LSR. > > P.S. I don’t think there should be anything _but_ the anglicised > version in the LSR. It’s a very bad idea to use German variable names > in probably any programming language.
At least in mostly functional programming languages. It might be argued that German is perfectly appropriate for imperative languages. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
