For example, the (pseudo-code) sequence:
(treble clef, relative c'')
{ b4 r8.[ d16] r8.[ e16] r8.[ g16] }
when I would notate it would always either shove the 8. rest outside of the
bar, or collide with it, or otherwise involve ugly beaming. I found I had
to re-write the rests as something like { c8.\rest[ } each time, explicitly
setting the position, and then use overrides on each group to set the stem
length. This seems like pretty kludgy code to me (and a pain to have to do
for each beam group). Cf. Gould 165.
Cheers,
A
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 11:10 AM, Thomas Morley <thomasmorle...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> 2016-09-08 8:52 GMT+02:00 Michael Winter <mwin...@unboundedpress.org>:
> > Is it possible to force a beam to always start (vertically) a minimum
> > distance from the staff regardless of the stem direction?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Michael
>
>
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> well, it's doable. But why should I help you making LilyPond-output ugly?
> Is there any usecase which makes sense?
>
> Convince me/us! ;)
> And I will give it a try in the evening, now I have to run, job's calling.
>
> Cheers,
> Harm
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> lilypond-user@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
