On 07.10.2016 20:34, Richard Shann wrote:
On Fri, 2016-10-07 at 12:13 -0400, Shane Brandes wrote:
Did you mean a 16th century font?
yes, the time signature font is one of the things that is looks rather
heavy against the LilyPond Petrucci glyphs. There are the early time
indicator glyphs of course, but the Rebel print isn't using them.
Which is no surprise since you said it’s from 1712. 1712 notation is
certainly closer to standard (i.e. mainly 19th century) notation than to
Petrucci mensural notation.
Best, Simon
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
