On Thu 17 Nov 2016 at 01:35:36 (+0000), MING TSANG wrote: > David, > Thank you for the link.I forgot about it. it seems not the same to me. > previous:(lilypond.exe:1892): > Pango-WARNING **: Invalid UTF-8 string passed to pango_layout_set_text() > warning: no glyph for character U+FFFD in font `C:/Windows/fonts/times.ttf' > current:(lilypond-windows.exe:8336): > Pango-WARNING **: Invalid UTF-8 string passed to pango_layout_set_text() > warning: no glyph for character U+FFFD in font `C:/Windows/fonts/times.ttf'
Well, you could try running the same program in the same version if you want to satisfy my curiosity as to whether the number following the name of the executable (whose significance is a mystery to me) would then be the same, 1892. But that might be difficult as you presumably weren't running ≥ 2.19.49 last year but would be now. > The conclusion previous is postscript. > Question:1. Is lilypond using the most updated postscript (PS)? Don't know. I kind of doubt it. You could try setting the target to PS instrad of PDF and then take a look. > 2. If not, when will lilybond updating the new PS No idea. What are the benefits for making any change needed? > - is new PS fixes the problem? What problem. You haven't diagnosed the problem yet. My crystal ball is not clear enough to see the source code that's giving this problem. All I've seen is an error message identical to the one from last year. Cheers, David. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user