On 01/01/17 23:34, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote: > > Am 2017-01-01 um 21:07 schrieb Wols Lists <antli...@youngman.org.uk>: > >> On 01/01/17 19:56, Urs Liska wrote: >>>> I think that has changed years ago already, but the last time I looked, >>>>> Oolilypond did not make any use of it. >> >>> Oh, then it would definitely be worth looking into again. Being able to >>> maintain vector quality examples in a word processor like this would be a >>> huge selling point for getting musicologists away from MS Word. >> >> Just make sure you look in the right place ... :-) >> >> I follow the LO dev mailing list, and last I remember (probably mid last >> year) it was a bit of a mess with some filters importing vectors >> unchanged, and other filters converting it to internal LO structures. >> And it was a bit of a russian roulette which one was applied to your file. >> >> I know the aim was to clean it up, and it was clear that stuff imported >> should NOT be converted unless/until the user tried to edit it, but I >> don't know where that went. > > Several years ago I looked into OO’s vector drawing structures and found them > to be a subset of SVG. > Maybe there is a good conversion of LilyPond’s SVG subset to LO’s possible? > I'm sure there is. I'm just saying that the import procedure was broken such that users were likely to get a substandard experience. I hope it's been fixed by now.
Cheers, Wol _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
