On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 10:28 AM, David Nalesnik <david.nales...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Kieren, > > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 9:51 AM, Kieren MacMillan > <composerkie...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi David, >> >>> Further down in that thread is an implementation of shorten-pair with >>> hairpins: >>> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2016-06/msg00277.html >> >> The $1,000,000 Question: Why isn’t this in the distro? =) > > I think the interaction between this and other properties has to be > nailed down. I'm not sure if it behaves "as expected" in conjunction > with whatever other property affects endpoints (to-barline, > bound-padding). > > I'd welcome testing. > > Also, there's the issue of programming language. Should this > enhancement be added to the C++ original--easy enough-- or should the > distro ly:hairpin::print be replaced by a Scheme version? > > I'd like to see the stencil function in Scheme, because it would then > be very convenient for users to adapt it to their needs. > > A drawback would be speed, but would that even be noticeable? >
Patch here: https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/5029/ Testing welcome!! _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
