> On 2 Feb 2017, at 20:56, David Wright <lily...@lionunicorn.co.uk> wrote:
>> Yes, the idea was to just add "2x" to a repeat with two alternatives. How >> would that look, in your view? > > Isn't there a danger that the "2x" will be seem as merely a redundant > reinforcement of an ordinary repeat unless you mark the end of the > second alternative. It is ambiguous, indeed, in view of the alternatives. >> Otherwise, I used the "1, 3", "2", "4" variation, which looks fine. > > How good it looks might depend on the relative scale of the repeated > section and the alternatives. It is the second section here (cf. [1]). Normally, I would not bother write out exactly how many times a section is repeated, as it ad lib, and another requirement is that as the piece curiously exactly fills out one page, I did not want it to flow over. 1. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RB5V-SO8BdI
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
