Urs Liska <u...@openlilylib.org> writes: > Am 03.02.2017 um 18:20 schrieb Federico Bruni: >> Il giorno ven 3 feb 2017 alle 11:31, John Roper >> <johnroper...@gmail.com> ha scritto: >>> OK, I was asking because I have written a static command line HTML >>> site generator that builds from HTML, Markdown, reStruturedText, >>> Textile, Plain Text (.txt), and Microsoft Word (.docx). >>> http://jmroper.com/blended Is that versatile enough for you? Also, >>> how do you handle translations? >> >> Yet another static site generator (SSG)? The purpose is simplicity? >> (as compared to other SSG) >> I don't have time to test it in the coming days. >> The templates are simple HTML files with the added value of using >> {{variables}}? I mean, you are not using any existing template system? >> > > I can't comment on that right now. > >> ... >> >> Personally, I think that switching (for the website only!) from >> texinfo to a static site generator based on markdown/html source files >> and a simple template system would be wonderful. >> > > +1 > > Separating website content from general documentation should definitely > be an option.
What advantages do you expect from it? -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
