Wols Lists <antli...@youngman.org.uk> writes: > On 07/02/17 13:39, Kieren MacMillan wrote: >> Hi Wols, >> >>> I mean that the code for RehearsalMark was just a wrapper round an >>> ordinary mark. So if you tried to put both on the same barline, the >>> underlying engine just saw two ordinary marks, and threw one away. That >>> was very frustrating back then. >> >> What exactly do you mean by “back then”? >> >> I can’t even remember a time when this was a problem, and I’ve been >> using Lilypond since 2003. >> Perhaps by complete coincidence I just never had \mark and \tempo at >> the same moment until 2.17 (when I know for sure it worked fine). >> > Before then :-) - some time last century :-) > > I started using lily with 2.4, and I was forever cursing that "feature". > I don't know if the empty chord workaround worked then, either. > Certainly I didn't know of it. > > I thought you wrote the code that sorted it.
You are probably confusing Kieren MacMillan with Keith O'Hara. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
