2017-02-11 22:49 GMT+01:00 Thomas Weber <t...@notabit.eu>: > Am 11.02.2017 um 13:51 schrieb Thomas Morley: >> >> >> Arnold has put up some work to get a more automagic workflow. >> >> http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=990 >> http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=978 >> >> IIRC his work is not finished, so you probably will need to fall back >> to grace-spacers sometimes... >> > > > This actually solves my problem - thanks for pointing me there! I'm > relieved there is an existing fix. > > This looks like it should be the standard behaviour of Lilypond. Can anybody > tell how the chances are of integrating this into off-the-shelf Lilypond? > Would be really convenient.
The bug you encountered is one of our oldest and infamous ones: https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/34/ We already provide the grace-spacer-workaround in NR http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/special-rhythmic-concerns#grace-notes (scroll down to "Known issues and warnings") I already suggested to put the LSR-snippet into the docs or even point to it in the NR https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/34/?limit=25&page=1#2eca but with little success. Though, be aware it is _not_ a bugfix, but basically a rather nasty workaround. Hence I doubt this coding will ever be part of the source-code. Cheers, Harm _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
