Hi David, >>> \markup \with-dimensions #empty-interval #empty-interval >> >> I prefer >> \markup \with-dimensions-from \null > > Different thing. \null corresponds to a point-stencil (single-point > intervals), the first one corresponds to an empty-stencil (empty intervals).
Thanks for the clarification! I have three questions on this topic: 1. Will ‘point-stencil’ still be unseen? Or does it literally output 1 point [which could be seen at a high enough magnification]? 2. [Sometimes…? All the time…?] When I use \mark \markup \with-dimensions #empty-interval #empty-interval [**] the log gives warning: RehearsalMark has empty extent and non-empty stencil But output is as expected, and no other use of [**] seems to throw the same error. Is there a better way to make my RehearsalMark markup not interact with the spacing engine? 3. I’ve tried to simplify \with-dimensions #empty-interval #empty-interval by making it a tweak like nodim = -\tweak \with-dimensions #empty-interval #empty-interval \etc But every combination of that which I’ve tried hasn’t worked. What is the correct incantation, so that I can later say c’-\nodim \markup “foo” or c’-\markup \nodim “foo" ? Thanks, Kieren. ________________________________ Kieren MacMillan, composer ‣ website: www.kierenmacmillan.info ‣ email: i...@kierenmacmillan.info _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user