Simon Albrecht <simon.albre...@mail.de> writes: > Am 19.04.2017 um 05:00 schrieb Andrew Bernard: >> it is a very longstanding tradition that open source projects are > very modest in numbering releases, compared to commercial companies, > > As a contrary example: the version numbers that Mozilla uses nowadays > seem completely ludicrous. > By the way, there have been different plans as to when LilyPond 3 > should be released. At one time, it was supposed to follow the GLISS, > which was sort-of called off. Now I think one condition would be a > solution to the Guile v2 problem (be it even forking 1.8 or similar) > and fixing the critical issues currently present.
That does not call for more than LilyPond 2.20. LilyPond 3 could be a rework of the optimization engine doing away with the hard pure/unpure distinction. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
