2017-06-23 11:09 GMT+02:00 Maxime's Music <craig.dabelst...@gmail.com>:
> Thanks for taking a look at this for me.
Hi Craig,
as long as I don't need to post larger amounts of your code I'll answer onlist.
Hope this is ok with you.
That said, I was not able to compile your code in a reasonable amount of time.
I always aborted after ~2h compile-time.
Even while using
ly:one-line-breaking
to skip page-breaking I was not successfull, although you forgot to
include the saxaphon-music in the zip-file, so that I excluded it from
\score.
How long did a successful run last for you?
I'm on an admittedly weak laptop, only 4GB RAM. Using Ubuntu 16.04
64-bit with mutiple lily-versions.
Only thing I stumbled across is your use of scaling durations for
every tuplet like:
\times 2/3 {
r8*1023/1024 d'8*513/512 ( [ c8*1023/1024 ) ]
}
This does not make any sense to me. Why do you do so?
Anyway, even after deleting all scaling of this kind I didn't get a
successful run in a reasonable amount of time.
As far as I can tell nothing else in your code should be that
expensive to eat up memory or to let explode compile-time.
Would be great if someone else with a stronger computer could retest.
For example, I didn't try to exclude Melody_engraver.
During the 2h compile-time my computer is not usable for other stuff.
And I need to restart afterwards.
So I give up on this.
Sorry to be of not more help,
Harm
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
