thanks!
That does it
Am 22.08.2017 um 11:54 schrieb David Kastrup:
Jan-Peter Voigt <jp.vo...@gmx.de> writes:
... OK, now I found it!
It is a matter of order: If the edition-engraver is consisted before
the Timing the timing-information is not updated and so the last
reported timestep is used in the start-translation-timestep slot of
the engraver. A lot of the mods are applied in that stage of
translation.
So if you move the timing engravers *before* consisting the EE, the
mods are applied at the right timestep.
I don't know, if it is possible to change the order of
engravers/translators after they have been consisted. But I hope this
info helps for now.
Sounds like it would make sense to set "must-be-last" to #t in your
engraver definition.
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
