---- On Sat, 07 Oct 2017 20:49:31 +0800 Simon Albrecht <simon.albre...@mail.de> wrote ---- > On 07.10.2017 13:55, James Harkins wrote: > > But, it's a <b b'> chord where I want the lower tie to go down, and > > the upper one to go up... > > Put the ties inside the chord: > <b_~ b'^~>
Oh... I'm afraid I spoke too soon. The syntax is accepted, but ignored in the printed output. I still get two down-ties. It must be conflict-resolution logic. See the comment: "I remove *either* the a or the d from this chord, I get up/down ties." \new Score { \new Staff { << { \time 4/4 \partial 4 s4 | s4*2 } \new Voice = "zeroA03" \relative c' { \set tieWaitForNote = ##t <b b'>4 ~ <b_~ b'^~>1 <b e f a b d>1 } \context Voice = "zeroA03" \relative c' { s4 s2. \hideNotes % if I remove *either* the a or the d from this chord, % I get up/down ties from <b b'> above \voiceTwo \tieNeutral <e f a d>4 ~ \unHideNotes } % This displays the e-f-a-d notes % that are the source of the 4 extra ties. % Doesn't matter to <b b'> tie behavior %\new Voice = "zeroB03" \relative c' { % s4 % \voiceTwo \tieNeutral r4 <f a>2 ~ <e f a d>4 %~ %} >> } } hjh _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user