Maurits Lamers <maur...@weidestraat.nl> writes: > Hi all, > > I came across something peculiar in the order in which events are sent > out to the engravers. > Assuming I have listeners on notes, rests and breaks, it turns out > that a break event in special cases can be sent after other events on > the same moment. > So, my question is: when a break happens at the same moment at which > other events takes place, can I assume the break should always be > handled first?
No. Listeners should just collect the events they are interested in, and the actual processing should happen in process-music. The order in which listeners see events at the same time step is not defined. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
